US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 2,595
Reyna Sr. v. State of Wisconsin
as 2:2023cv01240
Petitioner:
Richard Reyna Sr., Richard J Reyna, Sr and Richard Reyna, Sr
Respondent:
State of Wisconsin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Linton v. Boughton
as 2:2023cv01180
Petitioner:
Alvin E Linton, III
Respondent:
Gary Boughton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Elmhdati v. Stevens
as 1:2023cv01168
Petitioner:
Mohamed Elmhdati
Respondent:
Christopher Stevens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
King v. Keyes
as 2:2023cv01171
Petitioner:
James King
Respondent:
Warden RD Keyes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Norwood v. Eplett
as 2:2023cv01136
Petitioner:
James Earl Norwood
Respondent:
Warden Cheryl Eplett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carolina v. Johnson
as 2:2023cv01130
Petitioner:
Cornelius Carolina
Respondent:
Steven Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mays v. Stevens
as 2:2023cv01119
Petitioner:
Antonio Darnell Mays
Respondent:
Christopher Stevens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
LaFaive v. Buesgen
as 2:2023cv01123
Petitioner:
Terrence T LaFaive
Respondent:
Chris Buesgen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Barrell v. Gierach
as 2:2023cv01081
Petitioner:
Lazaro Barrell and Lazaro Borrell
Respondent:
Warden Michael Gierach
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Morgan v. Eplett
as 2:2023cv01040
Petitioner:
Ronald D Morgan
Respondent:
Warden Cheryl Eplett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
