US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 81 - 90 of 2,595
Schuenke v. Jewell
as 2:2023cv00935
Petitioner:
Lloyd T Schuenke
Respondent:
Chantell Jewell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gillespie v. Noble
as 1:2023cv00921
Petitioner:
Quentin Lamont Gillespie
Defendant:
Jon Noble
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Solberg v. United States of America
as 1:2023cv00925
Petitioner:
John M Solberg
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Sanders v. Gierach
as 2:2023cv00916
Petitioner:
William J Sanders
Respondent:
Warden Michael Gierach
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dabney v. Gierach
as 2:2023cv00885
Petitioner:
Mark A Dabney
Respondent:
Warden Michael G Gierach and Warden Michael Gierach
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Vaughn v. Stevens
as 2:2023cv00843
Petitioner:
Kalvin E Vaughn
Respondent:
Christopher Stevens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Virgil v. Wells
as 1:2023cv00824
Petitioner:
Eddie Lamont Virgil
Respondent:
Jason Wells
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carolina v. Johnson
as 2:2023cv00836
Petitioner:
Cornelius Carolina
Respondent:
Steven Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Spencer v. Wells
as 2:2023cv00820
Petitioner:
Robert Darius Spencer
Respondent:
Johnson and Warden Jason Wells
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Solberg v. Krueger
as 1:2023cv00795
Petitioner:
John M Solberg
Respondent:
J E Krueger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
