Gupta v. City of Cambridge et al
Birendar Gupta |
City of Cambridge, Sheriff of Middlesex County, John Doe, Deck Brewer and John Smith |
1:2012cv11370 |
July 26, 2012 |
US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
Boston Office |
Middlesex |
William G. Young |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 17 Judge William G. Young: MEMORANUDM AND ORDER entered. The motion (#14) for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted; plaintiff is assessed an initial, partial filing fee; the motion (#4) for appointment of counsel is denied without prejudice to renewal after defendants have replied to the complaint; the Clerk shall issue summonses for service of the complaint on the City of Cambridge, the Middlesex County Sheriff, and Deputy Sheriff John Smith and the motion (#2) to appoint special process server is allowed. No summons shall issue with respect to the John Doe defendant. The civil rights claim against defendant Deck Brewer, a Massachusetts inmate, is subject to dismissal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2) for failure to state a claim up on which relief may be granted..... defendant Brewer is a private individual and is not alleged to have been acting under color of state law. If plaintiff wishes to pursue the claim against defendant Brewer, he must, within forty-two (42) days of the date of this Memorandum and Order, show good cause why the claim against defendant Brewer should not be dismissed or file an amended complaint.(PSSA, 4) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.