Gupta v. City of Cambridge et al
Plaintiff: Birendar Gupta
Defendant: City of Cambridge, Sheriff of Middlesex County, John Doe, Deck Brewer and John Smith
Case Number: 1:2012cv11370
Filed: July 26, 2012
Court: US District Court for the District of Massachusetts
Office: Boston Office
County: Middlesex
Presiding Judge: William G. Young
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 29, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 17 Judge William G. Young: MEMORANUDM AND ORDER entered. The motion (#14) for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted; plaintiff is assessed an initial, partial filing fee; the motion (#4) for appointment of counsel is denied without prejudice to renewal after defendants have replied to the complaint; the Clerk shall issue summonses for service of the complaint on the City of Cambridge, the Middlesex County Sheriff, and Deputy Sheriff John Smith and the motion (#2) to appoint special process server is allowed. No summons shall issue with respect to the John Doe defendant. The civil rights claim against defendant Deck Brewer, a Massachusetts inmate, is subject to dismissal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2) for failure to state a claim up on which relief may be granted..... defendant Brewer is a private individual and is not alleged to have been acting under color of state law. If plaintiff wishes to pursue the claim against defendant Brewer, he must, within forty-two (42) days of the date of this Memorandum and Order, show good cause why the claim against defendant Brewer should not be dismissed or file an amended complaint.(PSSA, 4)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gupta v. City of Cambridge et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City of Cambridge
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sheriff of Middlesex County
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Doe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Deck Brewer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Birendar Gupta
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?