Ortega v. Astrue
||Luz J. Ortega
||Michael J. Astrue
||November 7, 2012
||Massachusetts District Court
||Kenneth P. Neiman
|Nature of Suit:
||Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
|Cause of Action:
||42:416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
|Jury Demanded By:
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|August 9, 2013
Magistrate Judge Kenneth P. Neiman: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER entered. As follows: The court finds, first, that the discrepancy between the hypothetical and the RFC does not amount to an error of law and, second, that the ALJs decision is supported by substantial evidence. Accordingly, the Commissioners 15 motion to affirm is ALLOWED and Plaintiffs 13 motion for judgment on the pleadings is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED. See the attached memo and order for complete details (Lindsay, Maurice)
|August 9, 2013
Magistrate Judge Kenneth P. Neiman: ORDER entered. JUDGMENT for defendant. (Lindsay, Maurice)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.