Cases 1 - 10 of 4,410
Kimble v. Cheatham County Jail et al
as 4:2009cv00047
Plaintiff:
Jamar Corsay Kimble
Defendant:
Cheatham County Jail, Jaush Lawrence and Gregg Jinnett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Finger v. Anderson County, Tennessee et al
as 3:2009cv00187
Plaintiff:
Terry Elaine Finger
Defendant:
Anderson County, Tennessee, Paul White, Brian Hubbard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Easterling
as 2:2009cv02263
Petitioner:
Ronnie Jackson
Respondent:
Joe Easterling
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Goosby v. United States of America
as 2:2009cv02261
Petitioner:
Gregory D. Goosby
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Black v. Burns et al
as 2:2009cv00084
Plaintiff:
James W Black, III
Defendant:
Steve Burns, Neal Matthews and Susan Cristen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Forrest v. United States of America
as 1:2009cv01102
Petitioner:
Stephen Forrest
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
West v. Corrections Corporation of America
as 1:2009cv01101
Plaintiff:
Dennis L. West
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dixon v. Steward et al
as 2:2009cv02260
Petitioner:
Matthew Dixon
Respondent:
Henry Steward and Robert E. Cooper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Godsey v. Morrow
as 2:2009cv00042
Petitioner:
Garland Lee Godsey
Respondent:
Jim Morrow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Torres-Lopez v. USA
as 1:2009cv00103
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Argelio Torres-Lopez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
