Cases filed in Indiana
Cases 21 - 30 of 112,153
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00174
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00177
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Butler v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00404
Petitioner: Taurus Butler
Respondent: Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Arble v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00203
Plaintiff: Ronald E Arble
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (RSI)
Riffett v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv00175
Plaintiff: Janice M Riffett
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
WOOLSEY v. LEWIS BROTHERS BAKERIES, INC.
as 3:2024cv00084
Plaintiff: Kian Woolsey
Defendant: LEWIS BROTHERS BAKERIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Default
TRISHA A. LEBLANC v. SINGH et al
as 1:2024cv00838
Plaintiff: TRISHA A LEBLANC
Defendant: SIKANDER SINGH and GILLSON TRUCKING, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
ANDREW HAMM v. ERIC R. DUVENDACK et al
as 1:2024cv00844
Plaintiff: ANDREW HAMM
Defendant: ERIC R. DUVENDACK and VENTURE EXPRESS INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
JOHNSON et al v. TARGET CORPORATION
as 1:2024cv00842
Plaintiff: HELEN JOHNSON and KENNETH JOHNSON
Defendant: TARGET CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
MANKOVECKY v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2024cv00840
Plaintiff: JAN MANKOVECKY
Defendant: COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?