Cases 11 - 20 of 17,613
Ferrell v. Overton County, Tennessee et al
as 2:2024cv00033
Plaintiff:
Brandy Danielle Ferrell
Defendant:
Overton County, Tennessee, Clyde Collier and Matthew Farmer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00626
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00629
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Hughes v. Washington County Sheriffs Department et al
as 2:2024cv00085
Plaintiff:
Dustin Lynn hughes
Defendant:
Washington County Sheriffs Department, Foister, Travis Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cooper v. Lee et al
as 1:2024cv00173
Plaintiff:
Monolito B. Cooper
Defendant:
Bill Lee and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Gordon v. Dandridge et al
as 2:2024cv02333
Plaintiff:
Willie Gordon
Defendant:
Patrick M. Dandridge, A. Collins, D. Burton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wellman v. Robin Hood Condos HOA
as 3:2024cv00623
Plaintiff:
William Wellman
Defendant:
Robin Hood Condos HOA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
John Doe #068 v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00613
Plaintiff:
John Doe #068
Defendant:
William Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe #067 v. Lee et al
as 1:2024cv00051
Plaintiff:
John Doe #067
Defendant:
William Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Reed v. CC Apartments, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00616
Plaintiff:
Mario Reed
Defendant:
CC Apartments, LLC, Bres, LLC doing business as Buchanan Realty Group and Josh Lefevre Construction Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601 Fair Housing Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
