Cases 1 - 10 of 8,505
Galdos-Shapiro v. The Town of Great Barrington et al
as 3:2024cv30070
Plaintiff:
Arantzazu Zuzene Galdos-Shapiro
Defendant:
The Town of Great Barrington, The Berkshire Hills Regional School District, Paul E. Storti and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Doe v. MGH Institute of Health Professions
as 1:2024cv11290
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
MGH Institute of Health Professions
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754 Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv11285
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Vicente v. Kingkade et al
as 1:2024cv11270
Plaintiff:
Jesuino T Vicente
Defendant:
Kenneth w Kingkade and Edward Varteresian
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv11279
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Opalenik v. City of Northampton et al
as 3:2024cv30068
Plaintiff:
Stephen Opalenik, Jr
Defendant:
City of Northampton, Northampton Police Department, Gina-Louise Sciarra and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rivera Ujaque v. Mikkola et al
as 3:2024cv30067
Plaintiff:
Osvalso Rivera Ujaque
Defendant:
John-Michael Mikkola, Micky Dumais and Chicopee, City of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Coburn v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts et al
as 1:2024cv11244
Plaintiff:
Mark Coburn
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Massachusettes and Richard Belinsky
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv11231
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv40071
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
