Cases 11 - 20 of 50
Waye v. Mary, Baltimore Co, B.C.D.C. et al
as 1:2020cv02741
Plaintiff:
James Waye, II
Defendant:
PrimeCare Health Inc. Aramark and Mary, Baltimore Co, B.C.D.C.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Gueye v. Baltimore Co et al
as 1:2020cv02444
Defendant:
Prime Care Health, Inc., Aramark, B.C.D.C. and others
Plaintiff:
Moustapha Gueye
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Garrison v. Maryland Baltimore Co. BCDC et al
as 1:2020cv02381
Plaintiff:
Michael Garrison
Defendant:
Prime Care Health, Inc., Aramark Food Company and Maryland Baltimore Co. BCDC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Carter v. B.C.D.C. et al
as 1:2020cv02483
Plaintiff:
Taikee Carter
Defendant:
Aramark, B.C.D.C. and Prime Care Health
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Dorsey v. Olszewski et al
as 1:2020cv02338
Plaintiff:
Reginald Dorsey
Defendant:
Baltimore County Detention Center, Aramark, John Olszewski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Holloway v. PrimeCare Medical et al
as 1:2020cv02636
Defendant:
Aramark, PrimeCare Medical and BCDC
Plaintiff:
Gary Holloway
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Alston v. Prime Care Medical, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv02256
Defendant:
Baltimore County Detention Center, Prime Care Medical, Inc. and Aramark Food Inc.
Plaintiff:
Cameron Alston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Heil v. Baltimore Co.-B.C.D.C et al
as 1:2020cv02268
Defendant:
PrimeCare Medical, Inc., Baltimore Co.-B.C.D.C, Aramark Food, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Heath Roy Heil
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Whitehead v. Baltimore County Executive et al
as 1:2020cv02339
Plaintiff:
Renardo Whitehead
Defendant:
Aramark, Baltimore County Executive and Prime Care Health, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Jones v. Baltimore Co. B.C.D.C. et al
as 1:2020cv02270
Defendant:
Baltimore Co. B.C.D.C., PrimeCare Health Inc. and Aramark Food, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Jahiem J. Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
