Cases 11 - 20 of 43,442
Yarborough v. Clever et al
as 3:2024cv00901
Plaintiff:
John Christopher Yarborough
Defendant:
Austin Clever and USAA Casualty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00904
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00899
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fine v. Dougherty et al
as 3:2024cv00909
Plaintiff:
Paul Fine, Jr.
Defendant:
Dougherty, Grimaldi, Dow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barys v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00903
Plaintiff:
John Michael Barys
Defendant:
Commissioner Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of SSA Decision DIWC - Title II Worker or Child Claims
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00397
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Gonzalez v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00385
Plaintiff:
Diana I. Gonzalez
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of SSA Decision DIWC - Title II Worker or Child Claims
Lozada v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00376
Plaintiff:
Zaida Lozada
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 dc Review of SSA Decision SSDC - Concurrent Title II and Title XVI Claims
Aggarwal v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00892
Plaintiff:
Pawan Aggarwal
Defendant:
CVS Pharmacy, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00894
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
