Cases 41 - 50 of 84,498
Moss v. Parker Hannifin
as 0:2024cv01893
Plaintiff:
Lonnie Dale Moss
Defendant:
Parker Hannifin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Axtell et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv01852
Plaintiff:
Dennis Axtell and Karen Axtell
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc
2nd Pit LLC v. ASR Group International, Inc. et al
as 0:2024cv01859
Plaintiff:
2nd Pit LLC
Defendant:
ASR Group International, Inc., American Sugar Refining, Inc., Domino Foods, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Johnson v. Lew et al
as 0:2024cv01858
Plaintiff:
Chakotay Bobbie James Johnson
Defendant:
Daniel K. Lew, State of Minnesota Sixth Judicial District Public Defender and Center for Changing Lives
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. City of North Branch, Minnesota
as 0:2024cv01868
Plaintiff:
Eric Smith
Defendant:
City of North Branch, Minnesota
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv01857
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1101 Immigration and Nationality Act
Broadcast Music, Inc. et al v. ECE, Inc. et al
as 0:2024cv01851
Plaintiff:
Broadcast Music, Inc., Welsh Witch Music, Primary Wave Bops and others
Defendant:
ECE, Inc. doing business as Back to the SRO Bar & Grill and Elise Chester
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Metropolitan Area Agency on Aging, Inc. v. Trellis Co.
as 0:2024cv01854
Plaintiff:
Metropolitan Area Agency on Aging, Inc.
Defendant:
Trellis Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Socolova v. O'Malley
as 0:2024cv01856
Plaintiff:
Liubovi Socolova
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Curtis v. O'Malley
as 0:2024cv01849
Plaintiff:
Henry Edward Curtis
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
