Cases 11 - 20 of 101,818
Wolfe v. Dremel et al
as 2:2024cv00740
Plaintiff:
Lamanuel Wolfe
Defendant:
Robert Dremel, Jenny Vallaincourt, Sara English and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bartz, Michael v. Derus, Melinda et al
as 3:2024cv00398
Plaintiff:
Michael Donn Bartz
Defendant:
Melinda Derus, Erin Dunahay, Chad McCune and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson, Armani v. Sedevic, Richard
as 3:2024cv00394
Plaintiff:
Armani D. Jackson
Defendant:
Richard Sedevic
Not Yet Classified:
CCI Prison Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McClain v. Wells et al
as 3:2024cv01486
Plaintiff:
Justin McClain
Defendant:
Anthony Wells, Joshua Shoenbeck, Charles Rayford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jenkins et al v. Reaves et al
as 3:2024cv01488
Plaintiff:
Kejuan Jenkins and Anthony Hall
Defendant:
Anthony Wills, C/O Reaves, C/O Pedro and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jolly v. Otey et al
as 3:2024cv01489
Plaintiff:
Ronald Dale Jolly
Defendant:
Christopher Otey, Mike Miller, Wayne County, Illinois Sheriff's Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Span v. Nurse et al
as 1:2024cv01215
Plaintiff:
Samuel Span
Defendant:
Mindi Nurse, LaToya Hughes and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Poe v. Haynes et al
as 4:2024cv04103
Plaintiff:
Joshua Poe
Defendant:
. Haynes, . Stevenson, . Bryan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Franze v. Capper et al
as 1:2024cv00240
Plaintiff:
Brandon J Franze
Defendant:
Brandon Capper, Jimmy Heflin and Nick Barry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rogers v. Mitchell
as 3:2024cv00482
Plaintiff:
Tiger A Rogers
Defendant:
Mekel Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
