Cases 1 - 10 of 3,149
Armour v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00356
Petitioner:
Rickey R Armour
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sellers v. Dyer Police Department et al
as 2:2024cv00082
Plaintiff:
Antoinette C Sellers
Defendant:
Dyer Police Department, Briarwood Homes, Ann Marie Hudson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00020
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Phillips v. Staton et al
as 3:2024cv00352
Plaintiff:
Victor D Phillips, Jr
Defendant:
Brock M. Staton, M Lester and M Cox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Taebel v. Swift
as 2:2024cv00073
Plaintiff:
Mitch Taebel
Defendant:
Taylor Swift and Taylor Alison Swift
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00072
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilites Act
Jones v. Warden et al
as 3:2024cv00338
Defendant:
Katie, Warden, Bennett and others
Plaintiff:
David Michael Jones
Not Yet Classified:
PENDLETON CF E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sowder v. Elkhart County Indiana et al
as 3:2024cv00221
Plaintiff:
Robert Sowder
Defendant:
Elkhart County Indiana, Vicki Elaine Becker, Goshen Public Defender Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garrett v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00331
Petitioner:
Ishmell Neal Garrett
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Indiana State Prison
as 3:2024cv00203
Plaintiff:
Percy Jones, Jr.
Defendant:
Indiana State Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
