Cases 41 - 50 of 19,076
WILLIAMS v. BELLO et al
as 1:2024cv00747
Plaintiff:
MARCUS WILLIAMS
Defendant:
BELLO, BAKER, AKENADI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BUTLER v. GEO GROUP INC. et al
as 1:2024cv00744
Plaintiff:
KENNEDY EUGENE BUTLER
Defendant:
GEO GROUP INC., MARK SEVIER and BRILES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LEWIS v. BEDWELL et al
as 2:2024cv00162
Plaintiff:
TIYO LEWIS
Defendant:
BEDWELL, AIRMARK and FRANK VANIHEL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROYAL v. STATE OF INDIANA
as 1:2024cv00738
Petitioner:
DENAR ROYAL
Respondent:
STATE OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
COVINGTON v. STATE OF INDIANA
as 1:2024cv00740
Petitioner:
DAVID GEAN COVINGTON
Respondent:
STATE OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JORDAN v. WADAS
as 2:2024cv00163
Petitioner:
DENZEL JORDAN
Respondent:
WADAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
FEY v. WASHINGTON et al
as 4:2024cv00061
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR WAYNE FEY
Defendant:
WASHINGTON and STEVE BUSH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LAX v. MARION COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT JAIL AND STAFF
as 1:2024cv00729
Plaintiff:
NATISHA VERNELLE LAX
Defendant:
MARION COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT JAIL AND STAFF
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BROWN v. DUBOIS COUNTY et al
as 3:2024cv00078
Plaintiff:
JASON KEITH BROWN
Defendant:
DUBOIS COUNTY, SHERRIFF, JAIL COMMANDER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ORR v. ARAMARK CORRECTIONAL SERVICES et al
as 2:2024cv00161
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ORR
Defendant:
ARAMARK CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, BUTLER, FRANK VANIHEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
