Cases 1 - 10 of 19,074
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00177
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
BREWSTER v. TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DEPT. et al
as 2:2024cv00178
Plaintiff:
BARBARA JEAN BREWSTER
Defendant:
TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DEPT. and CALHOUN COUNTY SHERIFF OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PHILLIPS v. JACKSON et al
as 2:2024cv00180
Plaintiff:
JAMES E. PHILLIPS
Defendant:
JACKSON, NALL, K. PADGETT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LOPEZ v. CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00176
Plaintiff:
MARTIN LOPEZ
Defendant:
CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA, LLC, CASEY JACOBS-CAMPBELL and MIKAYLA WILLIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SAGE v. CRAWFORD et al
as 2:2024cv00179
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA LOUIS SAGE
Defendant:
CRAWFORD, STROSNIDER, VAUGHN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TOLLIVER v. BYRD et al
as 2:2024cv00175
Plaintiff:
THEOTIS D. TOLLIVER
Defendant:
SAMUEL BYRD and JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMPSON v. CENTURION HEALTH SERVICES, LLP et al
as 1:2024cv00809
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS THOMPSON
Defendant:
CENTURION HEALTH SERVICES, LLP, MICHAEL MITCHEFF, DUAN PIERCE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ARON-STOREY v. BYRD
as 1:2024cv00801
Plaintiff:
ANSHIOUS B.D. ARON-STOREY
Defendant:
SAMUEL BYRD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GUTIERREZ v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2024cv00800
Petitioner:
OCTAVIO MOJICA GUTIERREZ and CHRISTOPHER MONTOYA
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
STEWART v. WARDEN
as 1:2024cv00775
Petitioner:
ROBERT STEWART
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
