Cases 1 - 10 of 2,273
LAX v. MARION COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT JAIL AND STAFF
as 1:2024cv00729
Plaintiff:
NATISHA VERNELLE LAX
Defendant:
MARION COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT JAIL AND STAFF
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PRATT v. USA
as 4:2024cv00058
Petitioner:
SHAWNDRAE R. PRATT
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
BUCHANAN v. ALLEN
as 1:2024cv00719
Petitioner:
GERALD BUCHANAN
Respondent:
TRENT ALLEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
RINKER v. ARAMARK CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, INC. et al
as 1:2024cv00700
Plaintiff:
ADONIS ROBERT RINKER
Defendant:
ARAMARK CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, INC., MICHAEL CECIL, BRIDGEMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LUNSFORD v. BLACKBURN et al
as 1:2024cv00678
Plaintiff:
SCOTTIE LUNSFORD
Defendant:
BLACKBURN, HOWARD COUNTY SHERIFF, CENTURION MEDICAL STAFF and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LINTHICUM v. CENTURION et al
as 1:2024cv00659
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN LINTHICUM
Defendant:
CENTURION and RUNYON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FORGEY v. INDIANA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2024cv00610
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW HERBERT FORGEY
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS, TRICIA PRETORIUS, EMERSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NICKELL v. THIBAULT
as 1:2024cv00573
Plaintiff:
PERRY LEE NICKELL
Defendant:
THIBAULT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PARKER v. MARION COUNTY SHERIFF OFFICE et al
as 1:2024cv00558
Plaintiff:
CHAD PARKER
Defendant:
MARION COUNTY SHERIFF OFFICE, JAIL COMMANDER, DUSTIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WOODS v. REAGEL
as 1:2024cv00511
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER WOODS
Respondent:
REAGEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
