Cases 11 - 20 of 3,348
TEXAS GUARANTEED STUDENT LOAN CORPORATION v. ROSE SEEDING AND SODDING, INC.
as 4:2010cv00028
Defendant:
ROSE SEEDING AND SODDING, INC.
Plaintiff:
TEXAS GUARANTEED STUDENT LOAN CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00085
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
MCADAMS v. USA et al
as 4:2010cv00029
Defendant:
BRANDON R. BRUMMETT, STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
PAUL MCADAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00084
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
DOTSON, II et al v. CROSBY TRUCKING SERVICE, INC. et al
as 3:2010cv00050
Defendant:
CROSBY TRUCKING SERVICE, INC., CROSBY VENTURES, INC., STEPHANIE HOARD and others
Plaintiff:
CLYDE HERBERT DOTSON, II and CLYDE HERBERT DOTSON, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
WEST v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 3:2010cv00049
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
BASLER v. DIXON et al
as 4:2010cv00027
:
Defendant:
DR. COLLIER, RICHARD DIXON, MIKE HOPPER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00083
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SCHOENBAECHLER v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 3:2010cv00048
Defendant:
Circuit Court Judge JUDGE FINK and STATE OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2010cv00026
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
