Cases 41 - 50 of 9,098
CABLE v. WALMART et al
as 1:2018cv03361
Defendant:
WAL-MART ASSOCIATES, INC., WAL-MART PROPERTIES INC., WAL-MART.COM USA, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
RUBEN CABLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HENNESSY v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2018cv03359
Defendant:
COOK MEDICAL, LLC, COOK INCORPORATED and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Plaintiff:
DEBRA A. HENNESSY, DREW MICHAEL HENNESSY, CARRIE ANN HENNESSY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PENDLETON et al v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2018cv03344
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Plaintiff:
JOE PENDLETON and TERESA MONZELL PENDLETON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
EITMANN v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2018cv03345
Defendant:
COOK MEDICAL, LLC, COOK INCORPORATED, WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS and others
Plaintiff:
Beverly Eitmann
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1407
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv03335
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 b3
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv03343
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
BAXTER v. BROWN
as 2:2018cv00486
Respondent:
RICHARD BROWN
Petitioner:
WILLIAM BAXTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
COULSTON et al v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2018cv03348
Plaintiff:
JOHN COULSTON and JUDITH COULSTON
Defendant:
COOK MEDICAL, LLC, COOK INCORPORATED and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ROMERO v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2018cv03318
Defendant:
COOK MEDICAL, LLC, COOK INCORPORATED, WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS and others
Plaintiff:
TRACY ROMERO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
WOHLRAB v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2018cv03319
Defendant:
COOK MEDICAL, LLC, COOK INCORPORATED, WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS and others
Plaintiff:
WALTER WOHLRAB
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
