Cases 21 - 30 of 11,103
YATES v. HENDRICKS COUNTY HOSPITAL et al
as 1:2024cv00903
Plaintiff:
JAMES YATES
Defendant:
HENDRICKS COUNTY HOSPITAL doing business as BRICKYARD HEALTHCARE BLOOMINGTON CARE CENTER, BRICKYARD HEALTHCARE, INC. and GGNSC BLOOMINGTON LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MCCAULEY v. NEWREZ LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00900
Plaintiff:
DEREK STEVEN MCCAULEY
Defendant:
NEWREZ LLC, SHANNON O'CONNELL EGAN, CATHY DONDZILA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SPEECH FIRST, INC v. WHITTEN et al
as 1:2024cv00898
Plaintiff:
SPEECH FIRST, INC
Defendant:
PAMELA WHITTEN, LAMAR HYLTON, KATHY ADAMS RIESTER and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00892
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00895
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00071
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00890
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00884
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00070
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00889
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
