Civil Rights Cases filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Cases 1 - 10 of 11,094
PETERSON v. STATE OF INDIANA
as 1:2024cv00943
Plaintiff: WILLIAM PETERSON
Defendant: STATE OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BRYANT v. ESTATE OF LAURA J. BRYANT
as 1:2024cv00940
Plaintiff: ANITA S. BRYANT
Defendant: ESTATE OF LAURA J. BRYANT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00938
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00937
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act
RROS et al v. CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS, IN et al
as 1:2024cv00926
Plaintiff: RROS and BROOKIE R. MORRISON
Defendant: CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS, IN, INDIANAPOLIS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT, JOHN DOE I and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00927
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
GRIFFIN et al
as 1:2024cv00934
Plaintiff: KIMBERLY GRIFFIN, LUCAS WALKER, THOMAS TOMLIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GRIFFIN v. WALKER et al
as 1:2024cv00935
Plaintiff: KIMBERLY GRIFFIN
Defendant: LUCAS WALKER, THOMAS TOMLIN, DANNY CLARK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
YATES v. HENDRICKS COUNTY HOSPITAL et al
as 1:2024cv00903
Plaintiff: JAMES YATES
Defendant: HENDRICKS COUNTY HOSPITAL doing business as BRICKYARD HEALTHCARE BLOOMINGTON CARE CENTER, BRICKYARD HEALTHCARE, INC. and GGNSC BLOOMINGTON LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
COLEMAN v. CLODGO et al
as 1:2024cv00909
Plaintiff: SOPHIA R. COLEMAN
Defendant: BRENT CLODGO, I.P.S., FAMILY HOPE and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?