Cases 41 - 50 of 19,196
KING et al
as 2:2024cv00216
Petitioner:
DANIEL C. KING
Respondent:
INDIANA PAROLE BOARD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SZIMAKOWSKI v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2024cv00219
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM SZIMAKOWSKI
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CHRISTINA REAGLE, TRICIA PRETORIUS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LOWER v. RINEHART
as 2:2024cv00230
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN LOWER
Defendant:
DALTON RINEHART
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PHILLIPS v. ERNEST et al
as 2:2024cv00233
Plaintiff:
JAMES E. PHILLIPS
Defendant:
ERNEST, JACKSON, WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PHILLIPS v. MJEAN et al
as 2:2024cv00234
Plaintiff:
JAMES E. PHILLIPS
Defendant:
MJEAN, NEFF and HEOLTERBRAND
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PHILLIPS v. ELLIS et al
as 2:2024cv00235
Plaintiff:
JAMES E. PHILLIPS
Defendant:
MIKE ELLIS, JESSE and C. POPE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PINKERTON v. INDIANA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2024cv00913
Plaintiff:
DANZELL PINKERTON
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS and MARK SEVERE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PETERON v. PLAINFIELD CORRECTION WARDEN et al
as 1:2024cv00914
Plaintiff:
CAMERONS PETERON
Defendant:
PLAINFIELD CORRECTION WARDEN, FLOWER'S DORM REP, CO'S and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FARLEY v. DOBBS et al
as 1:2024cv00915
Plaintiff:
LARRY FARLEY
Defendant:
BRYAN DOBBS, KATHY GOEN, LEAH ARRINGTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BARNES v. STATE OF INDIANA
as 2:2024cv00236
Petitioner:
SAMAJUI D. BARNES
Respondent:
STATE OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
