Cases 61 - 70 of 71,442
MITCHELL v. WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP.
as 1:2024cv00917
Plaintiff:
SYLVIA MITCHELL
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00918
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
SWOPSHIRE v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2024cv00246
Plaintiff:
ZANALYNN SWOPSHIRE
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CHRISTINA REAGLE, TRICIA PRETORIUS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WRIGHT v. WARDEN
as 2:2024cv00238
Petitioner:
ALEXANDER M. WRIGHT
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
BUCHANAN v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2024cv00240
Plaintiff:
ALVIN RAY BUCHANAN
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CHRISTINA REAGLE, TRICIA PRETORIUS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00910
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PAYNE v. WADAS
as 2:2024cv00237
Petitioner:
JAMES PAYNE
Respondent:
J. WADAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
BRYANT v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2024cv00241
Plaintiff:
COREY L. BRYANT
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CHRISTINA REAGLE, TRICIA PRETORIUS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LOVE v. USA
as 1:2024cv00920
Petitioner:
MARVIN LOVE
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
RUSSELL v. ROBINSON et al
as 3:2024cv00092
Plaintiff:
TODD A. RUSSELL
Defendant:
NOAH ROBINSON and KHRISTINA PERRY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
