Cases 1 - 10 of 6,805
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00251
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Felton v. Root Insurance Company
as 2:2024cv00068
Plaintiff:
Derrick Felton
Defendant:
Root Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Cain v. Jackson Public School District
as 3:2024cv00244
Plaintiff:
Jsh'Nice Cain
Defendant:
Jackson Public School District
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Moore v. Fitch
as 3:2024cv00241
Plaintiff:
Surf Moore
Defendant:
Lynn Fitch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Marshall v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv00242
Plaintiff:
Kennardoa Abdyl Marshall
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
General Counsel SSA-Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Keller et al v. Newsom
as 3:2024cv00238
Plaintiff:
Harold Keller and Deborah Keller
Defendant:
John Newsom
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Adams v. Bailey et al
as 3:2024cv00236
Plaintiff:
Bobbie Adams
Defendant:
Sheriff Bryan Bailey, K-9 Officer Tony Shack, Investigator Christian Dedmon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Epps v. The Kroger Co. et al
as 3:2024cv00232
Plaintiff:
Marie Epps
Defendant:
The Kroger Co., ABC Corporations and John/Jane Does 1-5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Lacey v. State of Mississippi
as 3:2024cv00233
Plaintiff:
Reginald Lacey
Defendant:
State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Revere Tactical Opportunities REIT, LLC v. Perlmutter
as 3:2024cv00230
Plaintiff:
Revere Tactical Opportunities REIT, LLC
Defendant:
Isaac Perlmutter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
