Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in South Carolina
Cases 11 - 20 of 24,964
Wazney v. Sumter County
as 3:2024cv03436
Plaintiff: Robert W Wazney
Defendant: Sumter County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Bradley v. Brown et al
as 2:2024cv03429
Plaintiff: Darryl Douglas Bradley, Jr
Defendant: Ms. Brown, Sherisse Birch and South Carolina Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Seabrooke v. BCDC
as 6:2024cv03434
Plaintiff: John Seabrooke
Defendant: BCDC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Felton v. USA
as 4:2024cv03409
Petitioner: Kimo Takarra Felton
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Samuel v. Darlington County Detention Center et al
as 5:2024cv03410
Petitioner: Steven Lewis Samuel and Steven Samuel,
Respondent: Darlington County Detention Center, Sheriff James Hudson and Warden Wadell Coe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Newberry v. McMaster
as 1:2024cv03397
Plaintiff: Phillip D. Newberry
Defendant: Henry McMaster
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Dextraze v. Cribb et al
as 4:2024cv03407
Plaintiff: Kevin Richard Dextraze
Defendant: Deputy Sheriff Cribb, Deputy Sheriff Scott, Deputy Sheriff White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dextraze v. Mondules
as 9:2024cv03406
Plaintiff: Kevin Richard Dextraze
Defendant: Correctional Officer Mondules
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Santos v. Holloway et al
as 6:2024cv03328
Petitioner: Eliseo Santos
Respondent: Ryan Holloway and Scotty Bodiford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (County)
Santos v. Holloway et al
as 5:2024cv03328
Petitioner: Eliseo Santos
Respondent: Ryan Holloway and Scotty Bodiford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (County)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?