Cases 901 - 910 of 2,427
Ardis Health, LLC et al v. Nankivell
as 1:2011cv05013
Plaintiff:
Ardis Health, LLC , Curb Your Cravings, LLC and USA Herbals, LLC
Defendant:
Ashleigh Nankivell
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1121
Rolex Watch U.S.A., Inc. v. Rolex Deli Corp. et al
as 1:2011cv09321
Plaintiff:
Rolex Watch U.S.A., Inc.
Defendant:
Rolex Deli Corp. and Ali Mohamad
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Specht et al v. Google Inc et al
as 1:2009cv02572
Plaintiff:
Erich Specht and The Android's Dungeon Incorporated
Defendant:
Google Inc, Open Handset Alliance, China Mobile Communications Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Promotional Technologies LLC v. Facebook, Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv03488
Plaintiff:
Promotional Technologies LLC
Defendant:
Facebook Inc and Zynga Inc
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
British Telecommunications plc v. Google Inc.
as 1:2011cv01249
Plaintiff:
British Telecommunications plc
Defendant:
Google Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Xerox Corporation v. Google Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv00136
Plaintiff:
Xerox Corporation
Defendant:
Google Inc., Yahoo! Inc., YouTube Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
VirnetX Inc. v. Apple Inc.
as 6:2011cv00563
Plaintiff:
VirnetX Inc.
Defendant:
Apple Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Everglades Interactive LLC v. Playfish Ltd et al
as 1:2010cv00902
Special Master:
SPECIAL MASTER Vincent J. Poppiti, -SM-
Plaintiff:
Everglades Interactive LLC
Defendant:
Playdom Inc., Walt Disney Company, Playfish Ltd and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
PersonalWeb Technologies LLC v. Google, Inc. et al
as 6:2011cv00656
Plaintiff:
PersonalWeb Technologies LLC
Defendant:
Google, Inc. and YouTube, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 183
Cequint Inc. v. Apple Inc.
as 1:2011cv01224
Plaintiff:
Cequint Inc.
Defendant:
Apple Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
