Cases 11 - 20 of 29
Rovio Entertainment, Ltd. v. Ronnie Home Textile, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv06397
Defendant:
Does, Kenneth James Doeing, Qinqin Pan and others
Plaintiff:
Rovio Entertainment, Ltd.
Rovio Entertainment Ltd v. Young Star Toys & Gifts, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv05687
Defendant:
B&L Trading LLC, BLIF Trading Inc., Does and others
Plaintiff:
Rovio Entertainment Ltd
Rovio Entertainment Ltd v. AM Wholesale Inc et al
as 3:2013cv04719
Plaintiff:
Rovio Entertainment Ltd
Defendant:
AM Wholesale Inc, Ali Raza Ravjani, AM1 Wholesale Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Rovio Entertainment, Ltd. v The Kim Group, Inc
as 4:2013cv03512
Plaintiff:
Rovio Entertainment, Ltd.
Defendant:
The Kim Group, Inc., Jung Jae Kim, Jin Hwan Kim and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Rovio Entertainment, Ltd. v. GW Trading LLC et al
as 5:2013cv01079
Defendant:
Amaar Habib Inc., Amin Habib Inc., Ariahabib Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Rovio Entertainment, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
ROVIO ENTERTAINMENT, LTD. v. ANGRY CLUBS, LLC et al
as 1:2013cv23619
Plaintiff:
ROVIO ENTERTAINMENT, LTD.
Defendant:
ANGRY CLUBS, LLC and PATRICK CHARLES SIMPSON-JONES
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
ROVIO ENTERTAINMENT, LTD v. ANGRY CLUBS, LLC et al
as 1:2013cv23587
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Myhrvold v. Lodsys Inc et al
as 2:2013cv01173
Plaintiff:
Nathan Myhrvold
Defendant:
Lodsys Inc , Electronic Arts Inc and Rovio Entertainment LTD
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000 Cause Code Unknown
Myhrvold v. Lodsys Inc et al
as 2:2013mc00088
Plaintiff:
Nathan Myhrvold
Defendant:
Lodsys Inc , Electronic Arts Inc and Rovio Entertainment LTD
Opperman et al v. Path, Inc. et al
as 4:2013cv00453
Plaintiff:
Marc Opperman , Judy Long , Claire Moses and others
Defendant:
Path, Inc. , Twitter, Inc. , Apple Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
