Cases 81 - 90 of 427
A. Edward Ezor v. Betty T. Yee et al
as 2:2022cv00840
Plaintiff:
A. Edward Ezor
Defendant:
Betty T. Yee, State Bar of California, Leah T. Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ha v. Trustees of State Bar of California
as 4:2022mc80028
Petitioner:
Hung Ha
Respondent:
Trustees of State Bar of California
Daniel Everett v. State Bar of California
as 22-55046
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANIEL EVERETT
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA
In Re Kenneth M. Misken
as 2:2021mc01113
In Re:
Kenneth M. Misken
Petitioner:
State Bar of California
In the Matter of Daniel Everett
as 2:2021cv09688
In Re:
Daniel Everett
Petitioner:
State Bar of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Benjamin Pavone v. George Cardona, et al
as 21-56347
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BENJAMIN L. PAVONE
Defendant / Appellee:
GEORGE CARDONA, Chief Trial Counsel, Office of the Chief Trial Counsel of the State Bar of California, LEAH WILSON, Executive Director of the State Bar of California and ANDREW VASICEK, Senior Attorney, Office of Chief Trial Counsel
Reiner v. Navarette et al
as 3:2021cv02077
Plaintiff:
Mark Reiner and Martin Reiner
Defendant:
Jorge Navarette, Tom Zhang, Tani Cantil-Sakauye and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Civil Remedies: Racketeering (RICO) Act
George Austin v. State Bar of California, et al
as 21-17031
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GEORGE JARVIS AUSTIN
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA, ERIN MORGAN, Bar #259356, NIMRA SUHAIL, Bar #297154 and others
George Austin v. State Bar of California, et al
as 21-16976
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GEORGE JARVIS AUSTIN
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA, ERIN MORGAN, Bar #259356, NIMRA SUHAIL, Bar #297154 and others
Shelly Hart v. The State Bar of California et al
as 2:2021cv08786
Plaintiff:
Shelly Hart
Defendant:
The State Bar of California, Steve Mazer, William Todd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
