Cases 1 - 10 of 9,822
Rivers v. South Mountain Justice Center et al
as 2:2024cv00957
Plaintiff:
Keith Rivers
Defendant:
South Mountain Justice Center, Viswanath Dhyaram, Brian Crimp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00960
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00943
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
McCleland v. Tempe, City of et al
as 2:2024cv00926
Plaintiff:
James F McCleland, II
Defendant:
Tempe, City of, Rosa Inchausti, Andrew Ching and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00932
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Carrillo v. Chex Systems Incorporated
as 2:2024cv00937
Plaintiff:
Judy Carrillo
Defendant:
Chex Systems Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Carrillo v. 99 Cents Only Stores LLC
as 2:2024cv00938
Plaintiff:
Judy Carrillo
Defendant:
99 Cents Only Stores LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00219
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Douglass v. HonorHealth et al
as 2:2024cv00928
Plaintiff:
Michael W Douglass
Defendant:
HonorHealth, HonorHealth named as: HonorHealth dba Deer Valley Medical Center doing business as Deer Valley Medical Center, Todd LaPorte and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Canales v. Trump et al
as 2:2024cv00902
Plaintiff:
Jose Ruben Canales, Jr.
Defendant:
Donald Trump, Elon Musk and Michael J Pence
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
