Cases 21 - 30 of 12,067
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00661
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Adkins v. Skivers et al
as 4:2024cv00343
Plaintiff:
Robert Joshua Adkins
Defendant:
Officer Jason Skivers, City of Sugar Creek, Officer Ethan Meier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv03144
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00660
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00395
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681 Title 9 of the Education Amendment Act of 1972
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04077
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv03080
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Vishnani v. City of Independence, Missouri
as 4:2024cv00185
Plaintiff:
Shiraj Vishnani and Salima Vishani
Defendant:
City of Independence, Missouri
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Johnson-Byrd et al v. PennyMac Loan Services, LLC
as 4:2024cv00200
Plaintiff:
Arlene Johnson-Byrd and Louis Byrd
Defendant:
PennyMac Loan Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00646
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
