Cases 31 - 40 of 95,444
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv03144
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Hall v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv05035
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Hall
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Lettieri v. Keete Group
as 4:2024cv00673
Plaintiff:
David Lettieri
Defendant:
Keete Group
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sesson v. Ruhman et al
as 4:2024cv00676
Plaintiff:
Johnny Bruce Sesson, III
Defendant:
Det. Crystal Ruhman, Det. Matthew Geisman and Det. Joseph Percich
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00660
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Value Plus, Inc. v. Cubework.com, Inc.
as 4:2024cv00342
Plaintiff:
Value Plus, Inc.
Defendant:
Cubework.com, Inc. doing business as Superflea by Cubework.com, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Nelson v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv05034
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Noah Nelson
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
United States of America v. Handley
as 6:2024cv03141
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Granger Handley
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 4246 Petition to Determine Present Mental Condition of Imprisoned Person
SCP Distributors LLC v. Wooden Spoon Pools of Innsbrook, LLC et al
as 4:2024cv00659
Plaintiff:
SCP Distributors LLC
Defendant:
Wooden Spoon Pools of Innsbrook, LLC and Dustin Loeffler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Perficient, Inc. v. Draeger
as 4:2024cv00657
Plaintiff:
Perficient, Inc.
Defendant:
Ronald Draeger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
