U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit Civil Rights Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 1,650
Van Etten v. Fattman, et al
as 25-1095
Plaintiff:
GREGORY J. VANETTEN
Defendant:
STEPHANIE K. FATTMAN, ASHLEY STEWART, MEGAN L. BROWN and others
Kendall v. Doe, et al
as 25-1082
Plaintiff:
WINSTON KENDALL
Defendant:
JOHN DOE, RICHARD ROE and BOSTON POLICE DEPARTMENT
Zarlenga, et al v. US, et al
as 25-1062
Plaintiff:
LORI A. ZARLENGA and VICTORIA A. ZARLENGA, Decedent
Defendant:
UNITED STATES, GEORGE W. BUSH, individually and in his official capacity as President of the United States, BARACK OBAMA, individually and in his official capacity as President of the United States and others
North End Chamber of Commerce, Inc., et al v. City of Boston
as 25-1063
Plaintiff:
NORTH END CHAMBER OF COMMERCE, INC., 119 SALEM ST., INC., d/b/a Ristorante Euno, ANTICO FORNO, INC., d/b/a Antico Forno and others
Defendant:
CITY OF BOSTON
Radfar v. Covino
as 25-1068
Plaintiff:
SHARON RADFAR
Defendant:
JOSEPH I. COVINO, Sergeant of Police for the City of Revere, individually and in their official capacities, BRIAN M. ARRIGO, Mayor for the City of Revere, individually and in their official capacities, JAMES GUIDO, Chief of Police for the City of Revere, individually and in their official capacities and others
Interested Party:
KEEPER OF RECORDS, George Mason University Police Department
Spaulding, et al v. Meltzer, et al
as 25-1042
Plaintiff:
COREY SPAULDING and SARAH CATHERINE SPAULDING
Defendant:
ROBERT N. MELTZER and KAREN VAZ
Vose v. Neronha, et al
as 25-1039
Plaintiff:
CARLTON VOSE
Defendant:
PETER F. NERONHA, MOLLY KAPSTEIN COTE, VIRGINIA MARY MCGINN and others
Spaulding v. Warren, et al
as 25-1008
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration and ELIZABETH WARREN, U.S Senator
Plaintiff:
SARAH CATHERINE SPAULDING
Johnson v. Colvin Post Office, et al
as 24-2090
Defendant:
COLVIN POST OFFICE
Plaintiff:
ROBERT W. JOHNSON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
