First Circuit Intellectual Property Cases

Patent Cases, Dockets and Filings
Cases filed
Cases 641 - 650 of 1,653
RSS Feed | View as table
Group-A Autosports, Inc. v. J2 Engineering, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv13001
Plaintiff: Group-A Autosports, Inc.
Defendant: DNA Motor Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Mersen USA Newburyport-MA, LLC, v. Littelfuse, Inc.
as 1:2014cv12962
Plaintiff: Mersen USA Newburyport-MA, LLC
Defendant: Littelfuse, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
PerkinElmer, Inc. et al v. Illumina, Inc.
as 1:2014cv12831
Plaintiff: PerkinElmer, Inc. and Caliper Life Sciences
Defendant: Illumina, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Aplix IP Holdings Corporation v. Sony Computer Entertainment, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv12745
Plaintiff: Aplix IP Holdings Corporation
Defendant: Sony Computer Entertainment, Inc. and Sony Computer Entertainment America, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Ziplink, Inc. v. RCN Corporation
as 1:2014cv12646
Plaintiff: Ziplink, Inc.
Defendant: RCN Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Archer Mobility Products, LLC v. Penco Medical, Inc.
as 1:2014cv00257
Plaintiff: Archer Mobility Products, LLC
Defendant: Penco Medical, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Zond, LLC v. Fujitsu Semiconductor Limited et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv12438
Plaintiff: Zond, LLC
Defendant: Fujitsu Semiconductor Limited , Fujitsu Semiconductor America, Inc. , Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Crane Security Technologies, Inc. et al v. Rolling Optics AB We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv12428
Plaintiff: Crane Security Technologies, Inc. and Visual Physics, LLC
Defendant: Rolling Optics AB
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
CardiAQ Valve Technologies, Inc. v. Neovasc Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv12405
Plaintiff: CardiAQ Valve Technologies, Inc.
Defendant: Neovasc Inc. and Neovasc Tiara Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
Raymarine Belgium,BVBA et al v. Furuno Electirc Co., Ltd. et al
as 1:2014cv12415
Plaintiff: Raymarine Belgium,BVBA , Raymarine UK Limited and FLIR Maritime US, Inc.
Defendant: Furuno Electric Co. Ltd. and Furuno USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?