US District Court for the District of Maine Civil Rights Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 1,938
SHAPIRO v. CIANBRO INC
as 2:2024cv00142
Plaintiff:
ADAM SHAPIRO
Defendant:
CIANBRO INC doing business as CIANBRO CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
LIVINGSTON v. STATE OF MAINE et al
as 2:2024cv00138
Plaintiff:
JIMMIE LIVINGSTON, JR
Defendant:
STATE OF MAINE and US GOVERNMENT
Not Yet Classified:
MAINE ATTORNEY GENERAL - NON PRISONER IFP CASES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
COOKSON v. TOWN OF EASTBROOK
as 1:2024cv00136
Plaintiff:
BRUCE COOKSON
Defendant:
TOWN OF EASTBROOK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00135
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
GRAHAM v. MAINEHEALTH, et al
as 2:2024cv00128
Plaintiff:
PETER E GRAHAM, MD
Defendant:
MAINEHEALTH doing business as MAINEHEALTH CANCER CARE doing business as MAINE MEDICAL PARTNERS and AMIT SANYAL, MD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00127
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00117
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00116
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American Disabilities Act
GARCIA v. CHAPMAN
as 2:2024cv00109
Plaintiff:
LEIGHANN GARCIA
Defendant:
DAVID CHAPMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00091
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
