U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit Civil Rights Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 2,591
Konecny v. Tripper, et al
as 24-1040
Plaintiff:
ALAN J. KONECNY and J. ALAN KONECNY, AKA Alan J. Konecny
Defendant:
TRIPPER, INC., ORIGINE CALIFORNIA, INC., ASHLEY TULLY and others
Lawrence v. Garland, et al
as 24-1039
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL LAWRENCE
Defendant:
MERRICK GARLAND, Attorney General of the United States, STEVEN M. DETTELBACH, Director of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives and PHIL WEISER, Attorney General of the State of Colorado
Snyder v. Fourth Judicial District of Utah, et al
as 24-4013
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND MAX SNYDER
Defendant:
FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF UTAH, STATE OF UTAH, JUSTIN D. HEIDEMAN and others
Hallum v. Sheriff of Delaware County, et al
as 24-5012
Plaintiff:
BRIAN HALLUM
Defendant:
SHERIFF OF DELAWARE COUNTY, in his official capacity, RONALD WILLIAMS, JERRY TROUT and others
Escalante v. Burmaster
as 24-3010
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW AARON ESCALANTE
Defendant:
PAUL WILLIAM BURMASTER
Wright v. Eberharter, et al
as 24-1030
Plaintiff:
ALLISON T. WRIGHT
Defendant:
RICHARD R. EBERHARTER and WILLIAM BARTZ
Snyder v. Goble, et al
as 24-4009
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND MAX SNYDER
Defendant:
ALEX GOBLE, Individually and in his official capacity as a Justice of the Sixth Judicial District Court, of Sevier County, Utah, AMERICAN FAMILY INSURANCE, STEWART B. HARMAN, American Family Insurance's attorney and others
Snyder v. Bagley, et al
as 24-4011
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND MAX SNYDER
Defendant:
JUDGE MARVIN BAGLEY, individually and in his official capacity as Justice of the Sixth Judicial District Court of Sevier County, AMERICAN FAMILY INSURANCE, LAUARA ANN LISK and others
Snyder v. Sixth Judicial District of Utah, et al
as 24-4010
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND MAX SNYDER
Defendant:
SIXTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF UTAH, ROBERT P. FAUST and MATTHEW R. HOWELL
Kahler v. Wal-Mart Stores
as 24-1023
Plaintiff:
MARY LEE KAHLER
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES, INC., AKA Walmart, Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
