Tenth Circuit Prisoner Petitions Cases

General Cases, Dockets and Filings
Cases filed
Cases 61 - 70 of 17,655
Wilson v. Bridges
as 24-5041
Petitioner: GARRY WAYNE WILSON
Respondent: CARRIE BRIDGES, Warden
Stroud v. No Named Respondent
as 1:2024cv00932
Petitioner: Mark Stroud
Defendant: No Named Respondent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Garcia v. Drummond
as 5:2024cv00341
Petitioner: Harry Garcia
Respondent: Gentner Drummond
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Esquivel Garcia (PS) v. ICE/DHS et al
as 1:2024cv00910
Petitioner: Walberto Esquivel Garcia
Respondent: ICE/DHS, Alejandro Mayorkas, Merrick Garland and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 in - Habeas Corpus: INS
Spalding v. United States of America
as 5:2024cv00337
Petitioner: David L Spalding
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Pemberton v. Miller
as 24-7027
Petitioner: PAUL CURTIS PEMBERTON
Respondent: MICHAEL MILLER, Warden
Czajkowski (PS) v. Karn
as 1:2024cv00906
Petitioner: Conrad J. Czajkowski
Respondent: Kimberly Jo Karn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Reed (PS) v. People of the State of Colorado, The
as 1:2024cv00921
Petitioner: Andre D. Reed, Sr.
Respondent: People of the State of Colorado, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Doneyson (PS) v. No Named Respondent
as 1:2024cv00893
Petitioner: Christopher Doneyson
Respondent: No Named Respondent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lombard-Jackson (PS) v. Collins
as 1:2024cv00896
Petitioner: Kiki Lombard-Jackson
Respondent: Larry C.I.M. Collins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?