Tenth Circuit Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 17,668
Crosby (PS) v. USA
as 1:2024cv01103
Petitioner:
James B.V. Crosby
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams (PS) v. Director, Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2024cv01107
Petitioner:
Nathaniel Williams
Respondent:
Director, Federal Bureau of Prisons, J. F. Williams, A. Owens and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Czajkowski (PS) v. Karn et al
as 1:2024cv01112
Petitioner:
Conrad Czajkowski
Respondent:
Kimberly Karn, Michael Allen, Ainsile Neubert and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Reid (PS) v. Ciolli et al
as 1:2024cv01114
Petitioner:
Richard Reid
Respondent:
A. Ciolli, English, A. Matevousian and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Crosby (PS) v. Ciolli et al
as 1:2024cv01128
Petitioner:
Gregory D. Crosby and Gregory D. Cosby
Respondent:
A. Ciolli and Fed. Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Norman v. Rankins
as 4:2024cv00182
Petitioner:
Marcell Jeron Norman
Respondent:
William Rankins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Weinert v. State of Oklahoma
as 6:2024cv00140
Petitioner:
Steven Alexander Weinert
Respondent:
State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harris v. Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2024cv00407
Petitioner:
Turischevia J Harris
Respondent:
Department of Corrections, Mable Bassett Correctional Center and Tamika White
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Campbell (PS) v. No Named Respondent
as 1:2024cv01201
Petitioner:
Edward H. Campbell
Respondent:
No Named Respondent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
