Tenth Circuit Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 7,980
Urrutia v. Bates, et al
as 24-3178
Plaintiff:
OSCAR DAVID URRUTIA
Defendant:
JACE TWEEDY, A. MERIN, KYLE LAWSON and others
Adkins (ID 91202) v. Kansas, State of et al
as 5:2024cv03210
Defendant:
Jeff Zmuda, Jennifer Laha, Sarah D. Madgwick and others
Plaintiff:
Wesley L. Adkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Armbrister et al
as 5:2024cv03209
Defendant:
(fnu) Peters, Jay Armbrister, (fnu) (lnu) and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Lee Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garrison v. Kitchens et al
as 5:2024cv03207
Defendant:
Pat Kitchens and Leavenworth Police Department
Plaintiff:
Joe Randall Garrison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crump v. Johnson County Board of Commissioners, et al
as 24-3174
Defendant:
JOHNSON COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, (FNU) (LNU), (6), SUMMIT COMPANY and others
Plaintiff:
STEVEN CRUMP
Vela (ID 107219) v. Stevens et al
as 5:2024cv03201
Defendant:
Aramark and (fnu) Stevens
Plaintiff:
Guillermo Vela
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kristich v. Casady, et al
as 24-6242
Defendant:
FNU WILWOOD, Transport Officer, in official and individual capacity, FNU MERK, Unit Counselor, in official and individual capacity, FNU DICKERSON, Warden, Cimarron Correctional Facility, in official and individual capacity and others
Plaintiff:
ORIN KRISTICH
Tran (ID 98510) v. Holthaus et al
as 5:2024cv03199
Defendant:
Leonard R. Moore, James D. Wilkey, Noah M. Packard and others
Plaintiff:
Danny Tran
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Johnson County Detention Center, et al
as 24-3172
Defendant:
(FNU) (LNU) INMATES IN 7-A, (FNU) MILLER, FNU MURPHY and others
Plaintiff:
DEDRICK A. JONES
Jones v. Johnson County Detention Center, et al
as 24-3173
Defendant:
INMATES IN 7-8, FNU GAINS, (FNU) WISEMAN and others
Plaintiff:
DEDRICK A. JONES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
