US District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 101 - 110 of 2,501
Alberty v. Rankins
as 4:2023cv00312
Petitioner:
Farron Whitney Alberty
Respondent:
United States of America, William Rankins and Chris Rankins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bolin v. Oklahoma, State of
as 4:2023cv00296
Plaintiff:
David Wayne Bolin
Defendant:
Oklahoma, State of and State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
King v. Tjeerdsma et al
as 4:2023cv00298
Plaintiff:
Ra'Terrius King
Defendant:
John Tjeerdsma, Jeffery Gatwood, Tulsa County Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00299
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 5 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00300
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 5 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Cannon v. State of Oklahoma, The
as 4:2023cv00293
Petitioner:
Jemaine Monteil Cannon
Respondent:
State of Oklahoma, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
O'Rourke v. Bridges
as 4:2023cv00290
Petitioner:
Bryan Christopher O'Rourke
Respondent:
Carrie Bridges
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Barnes v. Tulsa Police Department et al
as 4:2023cv00288
Defendant:
B Keener, J Faircloth, Tulsa Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
Dario Perez Barnes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Elton v Buss
as 4:2023cv00284
Petitioner:
Robert Elton
Respondent:
David Buss
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Palms v. USA
as 4:2023cv00281
Petitioner:
Ramar Travelle Palms
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
