US District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 2,494
Walker v. USA
as 4:2023cv00454
Petitioner:
Amanda Lyn Walker
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Leonard v. Walton et al
as 4:2023cv00451
Plaintiff:
David Wayne Leonard
Defendant:
Scott Walton, K. Jones, Turn Key Health Clinics, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Barnett v. Regalado et al
as 4:2023cv00445
Plaintiff:
Christopher J Barnett, Christopher J Magnum and Chris Mangum
Defendant:
Vic Regalado, Chaplin Bell, Chaplin Smiley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lasley v. Harpe
as 4:2023cv00446
Petitioner:
Tori Lynn Lasley
Respondent:
Steven Harpe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ferrell v. Harpe
as 4:2023cv00441
Petitioner:
Johnny Van Ferrell, Jr
Respondent:
Steven Harpe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thompson v. State of Oklahoma
as 4:2023cv00442
Petitioner:
Maurice Lajuan Thompson
Respondent:
State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jackson v. Hershberger et al
as 4:2023cv00439
Plaintiff:
Jesse Michael Wayne Jackson and Artemis Adams Anderson Andersen
Defendant:
Edwin Hershberger, Mike Reed, Damon Brandt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Etuk v. USA
as 4:2023cv00430
Petitioner:
Ibanga Etuk
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Hamett v. USA
as 4:2023cv00428
Petitioner:
Randy Alan Hamett
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Savage v. State of Oklahoma, The et al
as 4:2023cv00427
Plaintiff:
Marquice Donnell Savage
Defendant:
State of Oklahoma, The, Stephen Kunzweiler and Lauren Crudup
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
