Oklahoma Civil Rights Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 9,227
Fox v. Loman et al
as 5:2024cv00338
Plaintiff:
Kaci Fox
Defendant:
David Loman and Board of County Commissioners of the County of Canadian County, Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Longoria v. Wright et al
as 5:2024cv00334
Plaintiff:
Jesse Longoria
Defendant:
Dustin Wright, Jesus Hernandez and Oklahoma City Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Collins et al v. Mulkey et al
as 4:2024cv00144
Plaintiff:
Milton David Collins and Ericka Collins
Defendant:
Dylan Mulkey, Tim Tipton and State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00137
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00134
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00109
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00301
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Pursuant to the Family Leave Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00304
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00305
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 626 Job Discrimination (Age)
Wallace v. Guthrie The City of Oklahoma et al
as 5:2024cv00293
Plaintiff:
Richard Wallace
Defendant:
Guthrie The City of Oklahoma, Logan County Sheriff The and Michael Johns
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
