US District Court for the District of Utah Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 565
Wach v. Haddon
as 2:2020cv00862
Respondent:
Mike Haddon
Not Classified By Court:
Prisoner Litigation Unit
Petitioner:
Paul Wach
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gardner et al v. Duncan
as 2:2020rf00809
Petitioner:
Edson Gardner and Lynda Kozlowicz-Gardner
Respondent:
Luke Duncan
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 0640
Lawley v. USA
as 1:2020cv00150
Respondent:
USA
Not Classified By Court:
Prisoner Litigation Unit
Petitioner:
Dajuan Michele Lawley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Valles v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 2:2020cv00774
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, State of Utah and California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Not Classified By Court:
Prisoner Litigation Unit
Petitioner:
Andrew Valles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
McClanahan v. Hobbs
as 2:2020cv00767
Respondent:
Annik Hobbs
Petitioner:
Shane McClanahan
Not Classified By Court:
Prisoner Litigation Unit
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Spencer v. Rivera
as 2:2020cv00741
Respondent:
Rosie Rivera
Not Classified By Court:
Prisoner Litigation Unit and Dean M. Spencer
Petitioner:
Clinton Dean Spencer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Berry v. Haddon
as 2:2020cv00729
Petitioner:
Kevin Ray Berry
Respondent:
Mike Haddon
Not Classified By Court:
Correction Section (FYI) and Prisoner Litigation Unit
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Leavitt v. USA
as 4:2020cv00101
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Shon Lynn Leavitt
Not Classified By Court:
Prisoner Litigation Unit
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Hall v. USA
as 4:2020cv00098
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Virgil Hall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Regno v. USA
as 4:2020cv00097
Petitioner:
Michael Vincent Regno, Jr
Respondent:
USA
Not Classified By Court:
Prisoner Litigation Unit
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
