US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama Civil Rights Cases
Cases 141 - 150 of 11,125
Chapman v. Skipper
as 5:2024cv00023
Plaintiff:
Greg Chapman
Defendant:
Caleb Skipper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00019
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00016
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Crafton v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2024cv00008
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Crafton
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections, John Q. Hamm, Wendy Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gibson v. Brown et al
as 7:2024cv00005
Plaintiff:
Debra Yuniece Gibson
Defendant:
Lynn Brown and Dollar General
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00007
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Scott v. Phillips et al
as 2:2023cv01773
Plaintiff:
Jemayel Scott
Defendant:
Trina Phillips, Richard Holtzman, Courtland Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Meadows et al v. Leeds, City of et al
as 2:2023cv01774
Plaintiff:
Frank Meadows and Quinton Leroy Cook, Jr
Defendant:
Leeds, City of, Thomas William McDonald, McWhorter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01763
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01765
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
