Alabama Civil Rights Cases
Cases 121 - 130 of 17,431
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00287
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00294
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00292
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 ad - Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00295
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00154
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jones et al v. City of Mobile, Alabama et al
as 1:2024cv00073
Plaintiff:
Monica Jones, Jason Jones, Torin Robinson and others
Defendant:
The City of Mobile, Alabama and The Mobile Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bell v. Birmingham Board of Education
as 2:2024cv00279
Plaintiff:
Miss DeKorrie K Bell
Defendant:
Birmingham Board of Education
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Drummond v. Respiratory Sleep Solutions dba Stratus Neuro
as 1:2024cv00072
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Drummond
Defendant:
Respiratory Sleep Solutions dba Stratus Neuro and Respiratory Sleep Solutions doing business as Stratus Neuro
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Miles v. Hamm et al
as 2:2024cv00149
Plaintiff:
Vernus Miles
Defendant:
John Q. Hamm and Chadwick Crabtree
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00275
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
