US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia Other Statutes Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 488
FLORENCE v. CENTRAL PORTFOLIO CONTROL, INC.
as 4:2020cv00083
Defendant:
CENTRAL PORTFOLIO CONTROL INC
Plaintiff:
PHILIP FLORENCE
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
CELLCO PARTNERSHIP v. CITY OF VALDOSTA GEORGIA et al
as 7:2020cv00050
Defendant:
CITY COUNCIL FOR THE CITY OF VALDOSTA GEORGIA, VIVIAN MILLER-CODY, ERIC HOWARD and others
Plaintiff:
CELLCO PARTNERSHIP
HALL v. FINANCIAL DATA SYSTEMS, LLC
as 5:2020cv00112
Plaintiff:
ROBERT DONTAY HALL
Defendant:
FINANCIAL DATA SYSTEMS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
RADFORD v. I C SYSTEMS INC
as 5:2020cv00060
Plaintiff:
CYNTHIA RADFORD
Defendant:
I C SYSTEMS INC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
MOODY v. SYNCHRONY BANK
as 5:2020cv00061
Defendant:
DOES 1-10 and SYNCHRONY BANK
Plaintiff:
DIANN L MOODY
HALL v. CONSUMER COLLECTION MANAGEMENT, INC.
as 5:2020cv00052
Plaintiff:
ROBERT DONTAY HALL
Defendant:
CONSUMER COLLECTION MANAGEMENT INC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
DELK v. CREDIT PROTECTION ASSOCIATION LP
as 7:2020cv00012
Defendant:
CREDIT PROTECTION ASSOCIATION LP and CREDIT PROTECTION ASSOCIATION LP doing business as CPA
Plaintiff:
BONNIE DELK
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
COOKS v. COLLECTION AND BILLING SERVICES INC
as 1:2020cv00007
Plaintiff:
TIFFANY N COOKS
Defendant:
COLLECTION AND BILLING SERVICES INC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
MOSS v. RECEIVABLE MANAGEMENT GROUP, INC.
as 4:2020cv00004
Defendant:
RECEIVABLE MANAGEMENT GROUP, INC. and RECEIVABLE MANAGEMENT GROUP INC
Plaintiff:
JETTA NICHOLE MOSS
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
ATHENS CELLULAR INC v. ATHENS-CLARKE COUNTY GEORGIA et al
as 3:2020cv00001
Defendant:
PATRICK DAVENPORT, RUSSELL EDWARDS, TIM DENSON and others
Plaintiff:
ATHENS CELLULAR INC and ATHENS CELLULAR INC doing business as VERIZON WIRELESS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
