US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 2,484
AMERSON v. OLIVER et al
as 5:2024cv00149
Defendant:
TIER UNIT MANAGER SOLOMON POPE, DEPUTY WARDEN DERRICK MCDANIEL, DEPUTY WARDEN CURTIS L JEFFERIES, JR and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER L AMERSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HOLLINGSHED v. DAVIS et al
as 5:2024cv00151
Defendant:
AMBER COOK and SHERIFF DAVID DAVIS
Plaintiff:
GARY HOLLINGSHED
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BROWN v. AMANDA et al
as 5:2024cv00146
Plaintiff:
JOHNATHAN EDWARD BROWN
Defendant:
AMANDA, DENISE, SOUTHERN PARTNERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LANGHAM v. HUNT
as 5:2024cv00148
Defendant:
DR CYNTHIA HUNT
Plaintiff:
BRYAN DALE LANGHAM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PARKER v. BARNHART
as 5:2024cv00147
Plaintiff:
VRAIMONE GERMAINE PARKER
Defendant:
BARNHART
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DOUGLAS v. AMMONS
as 4:2024cv00070
Defendant:
Judge G WAYNE AMMONS
Plaintiff:
MELISSA A DOUGLAS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
OLIVER v. OLIVER
as 1:2024cv00070
Plaintiff:
Anthony J Oliver
Defendant:
Tyrone Oliver
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CLEGG v. WALTON COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, et al
as 3:2024cv00039
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL WAYNE CLEGG
Defendant:
WALTON COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE and CORRECTHEALTH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JORDAN v. WARD et al
as 5:2024cv00139
Plaintiff:
JOHNNY FRANK JORDAN
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY WARD, SHARON LEWIS, DR AYDEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HENDERSON v. STATE OF GEORGIA PAROLE BOARD, et al
as 4:2024cv00066
Plaintiff:
TAVARRES HENDERSON and JUHIIV ALI MUHAMMIED
Defendant:
STATE OF GEORGIA PAROLE BOARD and TERRY BERNARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
