US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 10,360
EDWARDS v. WIZA
as 5:2024cv00122
Petitioner:
JAMES MARCEL EDWARDS
Respondent:
SCOTT WIZA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WALDEN v. MUSCOGEE COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT
as 4:2024cv00055
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER WALDEN
Defendant:
MUSCOGEE COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00053
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2024cv00039
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00054
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
JOHNSON v. USA
as 7:2024cv00037
Petitioner:
TORRIEO MONTE JOHNSON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
TOWNES v. DAVIS et al
as 7:2024cv00036
Plaintiff:
DARIAN TOWNES
Defendant:
HEATHER DAVIS and WARDEN/C-T VALDOSTA STATE PRISON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTIN v. CHAMBERS
as 3:2024cv00032
Petitioner:
JOHN WILLIAM MARTIN
Respondent:
BRIAN CHAMBERS
Other:
ATTORNEY GENERAL STATE OF GEORGIA (NOTICE)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MURRAY v. COLVIN et al
as 5:2024cv00120
Plaintiff:
ALBERT GORDON MURRAY
Defendant:
JUDGE VERDA COLVIN, SHERIFF DAVID DAVIS, TOMMY WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00053
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
