US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 10,377
LEIGH v. HANCOCK STATE PRISON WARDEN
as 5:2024cv00130
Plaintiff:
TREMAINE DESHUN LEIGH
Defendant:
HANCOCK STATE PRISON WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00131
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00057
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00058
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
TERRELL v. WHATLEY et al
as 1:2024cv00059
Plaintiff:
WILLIE JAMES TERRELL, JR
Defendant:
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER TABATHA WHATLEY, WARDEN BENJAMIN FORD, TARMARSHE SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WATSON v. STATE OF GEORGIA
as 5:2024cv00124
Plaintiff:
JORDAN A WATSON
Defendant:
STATE OF GEORGIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
HENDERSON v. BERNARD et al
as 4:2024cv00056
Plaintiff:
TAVERRES HENDERSON
Defendant:
TERRY E BERNARD and GEORGIA BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
EDWARDS v. WIZA
as 5:2024cv00122
Petitioner:
JAMES MARCEL EDWARDS
Respondent:
SCOTT WIZA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WALDEN v. MUSCOGEE COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT
as 4:2024cv00055
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER WALDEN
Defendant:
MUSCOGEE COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00053
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
