US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 19,431
Cross v. Hays State Prision
as 4:2024cv00234
Defendant:
Hays State Prision
Plaintiff:
Darrell D. Cross
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WOODARD v. GILLIS
as 1:2024cv04476
Respondent:
Warden Gillis
Petitioner:
Timothy LaBron Woodard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Head v. White
as 1:2024cv04480
Respondent:
Jermaine White
Petitioner:
Trevio Head
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Deronceler v. Warden Thomas
as 1:2024cv04495
Petitioner:
Brian Deronceler
Respondent:
Warden Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Byers v. Douglas County Sheriff's Office
as 1:2024cv04501
Respondent:
Douglas County Sheriff's Office
Petitioner:
Valenton B Byers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04500
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 pr Complaint for mandamus relief (prisoner)
MCummings v. Caldwell et al
as 2:2024cv00230
Respondent:
Antoine G. Caldwell and Georgia Diagnostic & Classification Prison
Petitioner:
Maurice A. MCummings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MCummings v. Caldwell et al
as 2:2024cv00231
Respondent:
Georgia Diagnostic & Classification Prison and Antoine G. Caldwell
Petitioner:
Maurice A. MCummings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rice v. Hochul
as 1:2024cv04445
Respondent:
Kathy Hochul
Petitioner:
Jonathan Rice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
America v. Correct Care
as 1:2024cv04460
Plaintiff:
James America
Defendant:
Correct Care
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
