US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
Cases 111 - 120 of 115,159
Wingfield v. Pham
as 1:2024cv01877
Plaintiff:
Timothy B. Wingfield
Defendant:
Angela Phams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. Georgia Department of Behavioral Health
as 1:2024cv01878
Plaintiff:
Christopher Jose Adams
Defendant:
Georgia Department of Behavioral Health
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Mountain Progressive Ins.
as 1:2024cv01879
Plaintiff:
Norris Anderson, Jr.
Defendant:
Mountain Progressive Ins.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Simmons v. Maddox
as 1:2024cv01880
Plaintiff:
Eric Simmons
Defendant:
Melody Maddox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carlton v. Wrozier et al
as 1:2024cv01881
Plaintiff:
Lewis Alan Carlton
Defendant:
KK Wrozier, City of Smyrna GA, Smyrna Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sinsley v. UNUM Life Insurance Company of America
as 1:2024cv01855
Plaintiff:
Debbie N. Sinsley
Defendant:
UNUM Life Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Artax, LLC v. Samsara Inc.
as 1:2024cv01847
Plaintiff:
Artax, LLC
Defendant:
Samsara Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Patent Infringement
Primerica, Inc. v. MoneyBook, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv01862
Plaintiff:
Primerica, Inc.
Defendant:
MoneyBook, LLC, WealthWave, LLC and Thomas Mathews
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 a False representation-goods sold-interstate commer
Concessions HH, JV v. The United States Small Business Administration
as 1:2024cv01870
Plaintiff:
Concessions HH, JV
Defendant:
The United States Small Business Administration
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01842
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
