District Court Cases in Georgia
Cases 131 - 140 of 164,050
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02487
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 626 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02482
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02479
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00144
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Gobert v. Perry
as 4:2024cv00146
Petitioner:
Michael James Gobert
Respondent:
Warden James Perry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carson v. Pounds et al
as 1:2024cv02488
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Allyn Carson
Defendant:
Sheriff Tim Pounds, Head Nurse Germany and Douglas Count Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eberhart v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 1:2024cv02474
Plaintiff:
Kourtney Shantia Eberhart
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Elder v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 1:2024cv02475
Plaintiff:
Minnie Patrice Elder
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Rivers v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 1:2024cv02473
Plaintiff:
DeAngelo Shaheid Rivers
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
NetChoice, LLC v. Carr
as 1:2024cv02485
Plaintiff:
NetChoice, LLC
Defendant:
Georgia Attorney Gen Christopher M. Carr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
